Master
943acbc573
Durcit la convention de nommage des projets (dérive constatée : 'Sliding Automation', 'code_versioning'... au lieu des formes canoniques). - trilium_api.py : projets_canoniques() lit le référentiel = valeurs du label projet sur les notes de type=projet (source unique, pas de constante en dur). Note-projet CodeVersioning créée (manquait). - mcp_server.py : _valider_projet() branché dans les 6 tools de création (add_decision/history/backlog, new_conversation, create_entite, add_skill). Refuse un projet non canonique (suggestion si faute) ou inconnu (renvoi au processus de création de projet). Ne verrouille pas si référentiel illisible. - lint_audit.py : VAL-nommage aligné sur le référentiel (attrape casse, espace ET snake_case ; l'ancien 'contient un espace' ratait code_versioning). - Données : 79 notes ré-étiquetées vers les 3 formes canoniques. Quality by design : l'erreur de nommage devient impossible à l'écriture, le Lint n'est plus que le filet de sécurité.
151 lines
4.9 KiB
Python
151 lines
4.9 KiB
Python
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import hashlib
|
|
from collections.abc import Iterable
|
|
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, BinaryIO, NoReturn
|
|
|
|
from pip._internal.exceptions import HashMismatch, HashMissing, InstallationError
|
|
from pip._internal.utils.misc import read_chunks
|
|
|
|
if TYPE_CHECKING:
|
|
from hashlib import _Hash
|
|
|
|
|
|
# The recommended hash algo of the moment. Change this whenever the state of
|
|
# the art changes; it won't hurt backward compatibility.
|
|
FAVORITE_HASH = "sha256"
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Names of hashlib algorithms allowed by the --hash option and ``pip hash``
|
|
# Currently, those are the ones at least as collision-resistant as sha256.
|
|
STRONG_HASHES = ["sha256", "sha384", "sha512"]
|
|
|
|
|
|
class Hashes:
|
|
"""A wrapper that builds multiple hashes at once and checks them against
|
|
known-good values
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self, hashes: dict[str, list[str]] | None = None) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
:param hashes: A dict of algorithm names pointing to lists of allowed
|
|
hex digests
|
|
"""
|
|
allowed = {}
|
|
if hashes is not None:
|
|
for alg, keys in hashes.items():
|
|
# Make sure values are always sorted (to ease equality checks)
|
|
allowed[alg] = [k.lower() for k in sorted(keys)]
|
|
self._allowed = allowed
|
|
|
|
def __and__(self, other: Hashes) -> Hashes:
|
|
if not isinstance(other, Hashes):
|
|
return NotImplemented
|
|
|
|
# If either of the Hashes object is entirely empty (i.e. no hash
|
|
# specified at all), all hashes from the other object are allowed.
|
|
if not other:
|
|
return self
|
|
if not self:
|
|
return other
|
|
|
|
# Otherwise only hashes that present in both objects are allowed.
|
|
new = {}
|
|
for alg, values in other._allowed.items():
|
|
if alg not in self._allowed:
|
|
continue
|
|
new[alg] = [v for v in values if v in self._allowed[alg]]
|
|
return Hashes(new)
|
|
|
|
@property
|
|
def digest_count(self) -> int:
|
|
return sum(len(digests) for digests in self._allowed.values())
|
|
|
|
def is_hash_allowed(self, hash_name: str, hex_digest: str) -> bool:
|
|
"""Return whether the given hex digest is allowed."""
|
|
return hex_digest in self._allowed.get(hash_name, [])
|
|
|
|
def check_against_chunks(self, chunks: Iterable[bytes]) -> None:
|
|
"""Check good hashes against ones built from iterable of chunks of
|
|
data.
|
|
|
|
Raise HashMismatch if none match.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
gots = {}
|
|
for hash_name in self._allowed.keys():
|
|
try:
|
|
gots[hash_name] = hashlib.new(hash_name)
|
|
except (ValueError, TypeError):
|
|
raise InstallationError(f"Unknown hash name: {hash_name}")
|
|
|
|
for chunk in chunks:
|
|
for hash in gots.values():
|
|
hash.update(chunk)
|
|
|
|
for hash_name, got in gots.items():
|
|
if got.hexdigest() in self._allowed[hash_name]:
|
|
return
|
|
self._raise(gots)
|
|
|
|
def _raise(self, gots: dict[str, _Hash]) -> NoReturn:
|
|
raise HashMismatch(self._allowed, gots)
|
|
|
|
def check_against_file(self, file: BinaryIO) -> None:
|
|
"""Check good hashes against a file-like object
|
|
|
|
Raise HashMismatch if none match.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
return self.check_against_chunks(read_chunks(file))
|
|
|
|
def check_against_path(self, path: str) -> None:
|
|
with open(path, "rb") as file:
|
|
return self.check_against_file(file)
|
|
|
|
def has_one_of(self, hashes: dict[str, str]) -> bool:
|
|
"""Return whether any of the given hashes are allowed."""
|
|
for hash_name, hex_digest in hashes.items():
|
|
if self.is_hash_allowed(hash_name, hex_digest):
|
|
return True
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
def __bool__(self) -> bool:
|
|
"""Return whether I know any known-good hashes."""
|
|
return bool(self._allowed)
|
|
|
|
def __eq__(self, other: object) -> bool:
|
|
if not isinstance(other, Hashes):
|
|
return NotImplemented
|
|
return self._allowed == other._allowed
|
|
|
|
def __hash__(self) -> int:
|
|
return hash(
|
|
",".join(
|
|
sorted(
|
|
":".join((alg, digest))
|
|
for alg, digest_list in self._allowed.items()
|
|
for digest in digest_list
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class MissingHashes(Hashes):
|
|
"""A workalike for Hashes used when we're missing a hash for a requirement
|
|
|
|
It computes the actual hash of the requirement and raises a HashMissing
|
|
exception showing it to the user.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self) -> None:
|
|
"""Don't offer the ``hashes`` kwarg."""
|
|
# Pass our favorite hash in to generate a "gotten hash". With the
|
|
# empty list, it will never match, so an error will always raise.
|
|
super().__init__(hashes={FAVORITE_HASH: []})
|
|
|
|
def _raise(self, gots: dict[str, _Hash]) -> NoReturn:
|
|
raise HashMissing(gots[FAVORITE_HASH].hexdigest())
|